Post by account_disabled on Jan 1, 2024 1:00:37 GMT -5
Aparticipation of the representative of the Public Ministry prosecutor Luminia Nicolescu. . The resolution of the exception of unconstitutionality of the provisions of art. para. and art. para. of the Code of Civil Procedure exception raised by Dorin Crciun in File no. of the Alba Iulia Court of Appeal Section I civil and for cases regarding labor conflicts and social insurance and which form the object of the Constitutional Court File no. .D. . At the roll call the absence of the parties is noted for which the subpoena procedure is legally fulfilled. . The assistant magistrate refers to the fact that the author of the exception of unconstitutionality.
Submitted written notes in support of its admission to the case file. He Country Email List also requests the trial of the case in absentia. . The case being in a trial state the president gives the floor to the representative of the Public Ministry who shows that the author of the exception of unconstitutionality describes the factual situation being dissatisfied that the courts decision was communicated to. The author of the exception does not formulate criticisms of unconstitutionality but only recalls the practice of the courts regarding the way of communication of decisions and analyzes the criticized legal texts through the prism of his own interpretations.
Taking these into account appreciating that the invoked aspects exceed the constitutionality control exercised by the Court it makes conclusions rejecting the exception as inadmissible. COURT considering the documents and works of the file states the following . By the Conclusion of November issued in File no. the Alba Iulia Court of Appeal Section I civil and for cases regarding labor conflicts and social insurance referred the Constitutional Court with the exception of the unconstitutionality of the provisions of art. para. and art. para. of the Code of Civil Procedure exception raised.
Submitted written notes in support of its admission to the case file. He Country Email List also requests the trial of the case in absentia. . The case being in a trial state the president gives the floor to the representative of the Public Ministry who shows that the author of the exception of unconstitutionality describes the factual situation being dissatisfied that the courts decision was communicated to. The author of the exception does not formulate criticisms of unconstitutionality but only recalls the practice of the courts regarding the way of communication of decisions and analyzes the criticized legal texts through the prism of his own interpretations.
Taking these into account appreciating that the invoked aspects exceed the constitutionality control exercised by the Court it makes conclusions rejecting the exception as inadmissible. COURT considering the documents and works of the file states the following . By the Conclusion of November issued in File no. the Alba Iulia Court of Appeal Section I civil and for cases regarding labor conflicts and social insurance referred the Constitutional Court with the exception of the unconstitutionality of the provisions of art. para. and art. para. of the Code of Civil Procedure exception raised.